Desirable difficulties and the idea behind them
Elizabeth and Robert Bjork of UCLA use desirable difficulties for conditions of study and practice, such as spacing, interleaving, contextual variation and retrieval practice, that pose challenges but often enhance learning and transfer; Robert Bjork coined the term in 1994. They stress that the word desirable matters: if a learner lacks the background knowledge to respond to a difficulty successfully, it becomes an undesirable one.
The Bjorks explain why through two kinds of memory strength from their new theory of disuse (1992). Storage strength is how well learned and interconnected something is; retrieval strength is how easily you can access it right now. The higher an item's current retrieval strength, the smaller the gain in storage strength from restudying or retrieving it, so some forgetting between sessions makes the next review count for more. That is why the feeling of fluency is a poor guide to what you will remember.
| Term | Plain meaning | Use it in a course |
|---|---|---|
| Desirable difficulty | A harder way to practise that pays off later (Bjork, 1994) | Choose the quiz over the summary video when both are offered |
| Storage strength | How well learned something is | Judge progress by delayed self-tests, not by how familiar a lesson feels |
| Retrieval strength | How accessible something is right now | Expect it to fade between sessions; that fade is when review helps most |
| Fluency illusion | Mistaking ease of rereading for learning; restudy raised confidence without improving delayed recall (Roediger and Karpicke, 2006) | Do not stop reviewing because the notes look familiar |
Testing and retrieval terms
Roediger and Karpicke (2006, Psychological Science, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x) gave students either repeated study or recall tests without feedback. Restudy won on a test 5 minutes later, but testing produced substantially greater retention at 2 days and 1 week. Dunlosky and colleagues' 2013 review (DOI 10.1177/1529100612453266) rated practice testing as high utility. The Institute of Education Sciences 2007 practice guide rated quizzing to re-expose students to key content as strong evidence.
| Term | Plain meaning | Use it in a course |
|---|---|---|
| Retrieval practice | Pulling information out of memory rather than putting it back in by rereading | Close the video and write the main points before checking |
| Testing effect | The finding that a recall test improves later retention more than restudying (Roediger and Karpicke, 2006) | Retake ungraded quizzes a few days later, not just once |
| Practice testing | Self-testing or practice quizzes, rated high utility by Dunlosky et al. (2013) | Turn each module heading into a question and answer it cold |
| Pre-questions | Questions asked before a topic is taught; the IES guide rates the evidence as minimal | Try the end-of-module quiz first if it is ungraded, then study |
| Generation | Producing an answer from memory yourself; the Bjorks call retrieving a more powerful learning event than restudying, provided you have the prior knowledge to attempt it | Predict the next step of a worked example before the instructor shows it |
Timing and ordering terms
Cepeda and colleagues' 2006 meta-analysis in Psychological Bulletin (DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354) pooled 839 assessments from 317 experiments and found that the gap between study sessions that gave the best retention grew as the time until the final test grew. Kornell and Bjork (2008, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02127.x) found that mixing paintings by different artists improved learners' ability to identify new paintings by those artists, yet participants rated massed (blocked) study as more effective, even after their own test results showed the opposite.
| Term | Plain meaning | Use it in a course |
|---|---|---|
| Spacing effect | Spreading study over several sessions beats cramming the same total time | Schedule two short reviews of each module in later weeks |
| Distributed practice | The technique form of spacing; rated high utility by Dunlosky et al. (2013) | Split a 3-hour weekend block into three 1-hour sessions |
| Lag (inter-study interval) | The gap between sessions on the same material | Use longer gaps for an exam months away, shorter ones for next week |
| Interleaving | Mixing different problem types or categories instead of doing one type in a block | Make a mixed problem set from three earlier modules |
| Blocked practice | Doing all problems of one type together; feels easier and is often judged better by learners | Fine for a first pass, then switch to mixed sets |
| Varied practice | Changing the conditions of practice instead of keeping them constant; the Bjorks warn that unchanging settings supply cues that will not be there on an exam | Apply a formula or query to a second dataset, not just the course one |
Explanation and representation terms
The IES practice guide (Pashler and colleagues, 2007) rated asking deep explanatory questions as strong evidence, and rated interleaving worked examples with problems, combining graphics with words, and connecting abstract and concrete representations as moderate. Dunlosky et al. rated elaborative interrogation and self-explanation as moderate utility, and rated highlighting, rereading and summarisation as low.
| Term | Plain meaning | Use it in a course |
|---|---|---|
| Elaborative interrogation | Asking why a fact is true; moderate utility (Dunlosky et al., 2013) | Add a "why does this work?" line under each key point in your notes |
| Self-explanation | Explaining each step of a solution to yourself; moderate utility | Narrate a code walkthrough line by line before running it |
| Worked example | A fully solved problem studied before solving similar ones; IES moderate evidence when alternated with practice | Alternate: one worked example, then one problem you solve alone |
| Graphics with words | Pairing a diagram with a verbal description; IES moderate evidence | Sketch the diagram from memory and label it in words |
| Concrete and abstract links | Connecting a general rule to specific cases; IES moderate evidence | For each formula, write one real example from your own work |
| Delayed judgment of learning | Rating how well you know something after a delay, not right after study; IES minimal evidence | Decide what to review a day later, not straight after the lesson |
How to use this glossary
These findings come mostly from laboratory and classroom studies of particular materials. They are well replicated as general principles, but how large the benefit is for your course will vary.
- Start with the two high-utility techniques: practice testing and distributed practice.
- Add interleaving once you have covered at least two or three related topics.
- Treat feelings of familiarity as retrieval strength, not storage strength; check with a delayed self-test.
- Use low-utility habits (highlighting, rereading) only as a lead-in to testing, not as the main activity.
- Our method guides turn these terms into schedules: retrieval practice for notes, spaced practice calendars, interleaved problem sets and worked-example alternation.
Questions before you decide
What are desirable difficulties?
They are study conditions that make practice feel harder but often improve long-term learning and transfer, such as spacing, interleaving, varying practice conditions and retrieval practice. Robert Bjork coined the term in 1994, according to Bjork and Bjork.
What is the difference between retrieval practice and the testing effect?
Retrieval practice is the activity of recalling information from memory. The testing effect is the research finding that doing so improves later retention more than restudying, as Roediger and Karpicke showed at 2-day and 1-week delays.
Which study techniques have the strongest evidence?
Dunlosky and colleagues' 2013 review rated practice testing and distributed practice as high utility, elaborative interrogation, self-explanation and interleaved practice as moderate, and highlighting, rereading and summarisation as low.
Sources & verification
Product details and prices can change. Check the linked provider before buying.
- Bjork and Bjork (2023), Introducing desirable difficulties into practice and instruction: obstacles and opportunities, in In Their Own Words (APA Division 2), hosted by the University of New Hampshire Accessed 30 Oct 2026
- Dunlosky, Rawson, Marsh, Nathan and Willingham (2013), Psychological Science in the Public Interest 14(1):4-58, DOI 10.1177/1529100612453266 Accessed 30 Oct 2026
- Roediger and Karpicke (2006), Test-enhanced learning, Psychological Science 17(3):249-255, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x Accessed 30 Oct 2026
- Cepeda, Pashler, Vul, Wixted and Rohrer (2006), Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks, Psychological Bulletin 132(3):354-380, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354 Accessed 30 Oct 2026
- Kornell and Bjork (2008), Learning concepts and categories, Psychological Science 19(6):585-592, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02127.x Accessed 30 Oct 2026
- Institute of Education Sciences practice guide: Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning (Pashler et al., September 2007) Accessed 30 Oct 2026
Sources link directly to providers. Product buttons may use separately labeled affiliate links. Read our disclosure.